Reducing dimensions and cost for UQ in complex systems
Monday 5th March 2018 to Friday 9th March 2018
09:00 to 09:35  Registration  
09:35 to 09:45  Welcome from Christie Marr (INI Deputy Director)  
09:45 to 10:30 
Wolfgang Dahmen (RWTH Aachen University) Parametric PDEs: Sparse Polynomial or LowRank Approximation?
We discuss some recent results obtained jointly with Markus Bachmayr and Albert Cohen
on the adaptive approximation of parametric solutions for a class of uniformly elliptic
parametric PDEs. We briefly review first essential approximability properties of the solution
manifold with respect to several approximation types (sparse polynomial expansions,
lowrank approximations, hierarchical tensor formats) which then serve as benchmarks for
numerical algorithms. We then discuss a fully adaptive algorithmic template with respect to
both spatial and parametric variables which can be specified to any of the above
approximation types. It completely avoids the inversion of large linear systems and can be
shown to achieve any given target accuracy with a certified bound without any a priori
assumptions on the solutions. Moreover, the computational complexity (in terms of operation
count) can be proven to be optimal (up to uniformly constant factors) for these benchmark
classes. That is, it achieves a given target accuracy by keeping the number of
adaptively generated degrees of freedom nearminimal at linear computatiuonal cost.
We discuss these findings from several perspectives such as: which approximation type is
best suited for which problem specification, the role of parametric expansion types, or
intrusive versus nonintrusive schemes.

INI 1  
10:30 to 11:00  Morning Coffee  
11:00 to 11:45 
Jim Gattiker (Los Alamos National Laboratory) Complexity Challenges in Uncertainty Quantification for Scientific and Engineering Applications.
Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is established as an aspect of modelsupported inference in scientific and engineering systems. With this expectation comes the desire for addressing increasingly complex applications that challenge the ability of UQ to scale. This talk will describe the view of UQ as a fullsystem modeling and analysis framework for scientific and engineering models, motivated by the example application of Carbon Capture technology development, and some of the challenging issues that have come up in this multilevel component to fullsystem modeling effort are discussed, as well as strategies for addressing some of these challenges. Another challenge area is dealing with multivariate responses, and some implications and challenges in this area will be discussed.

INI 1  
11:45 to 12:30 
Leanna House (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University) HumanintheLoop Analytics: Two Approaches and Two Applications
This will be a twopart talk that presents two applications of humanintheloop analytics. The first part takes a traditional approach in eliciting judgement from experts to specify subjective priors in the context of uncertainty quantification of simulators. In particular, the approach applies and verifies a method called Reification (Goldstein and Rougier, 2008), where experts initiate uncertainty analyses by specifying a hypothetical, highfidelity computer model. With this hypothetical model, we can decompose potential discrepancy between a given simulator and reality. The second part of the talk places experts in the middle of analyses via Bayesian Visual Analytics (House et al., 2015) so that experts may explore data and offer feedback continuously. For BaVA, we use reduceddimensional visualizations within an interactive software so that experts may communicate their judgements by interacting with data. Based on interactions, we parameterize and specify ``feedback distributions'', rather than prior distributions, for analyses. We exemplify BaVA using a dataset about animals. To conclude, I hope to engage in an open discussion for how we can use BaVA in Uncertainty Quantification of Computer Models.

INI 1  
12:30 to 13:30  Lunch @ Churchill College  
14:00 to 14:45 
Francisco Alejandro Diaz De la O (University of Liverpool) Reliabilitybased Sampling for Model Calibration
History Matching is a calibration technique that systematically reduces the input space in a numerical model. At every iteration, an implausibility measure discards combinations of input values that are unlikely to provide a match between model output and experimental observations. As the input space reduces, sampling becomes increasingly challenging due to the size of the relative volume of the nonimplausible space and the fact that it can exhibit a complex, disconnected geometry. Since realistic numerical models are computationally expensive, surrogate models and dimensionality reduction are commonly employed. In this talk we will explore how Subset Simulation, a Markov chain Monte Carlo technique from engineering reliability analysis, can solve the sampling problem in History Matching. We will also explore alternative implausibility measures that can guide the selection of regions of the nonimplausible in order to balance sampling exploration and exploitation.

INI 1  
14:45 to 15:30 
Tan BuiThanh (University of Texas at Austin) A Triple Model Reduction for DataDriven LargeScale Inverse Problems in High Dimensional Parameter Spaces
Coauthors: Ellen Le (The University of Texas At Austin), Aaron Myers (The University of Texas At Austin), Brad Marvin (The University of Texas At Austin), Vishwas Rao (Argone National Lab) We present an approach to address the challenge of datadriven largescale inverse problems in high dimensional parameter spaces. The idea is to combine a goaloriented model reduction approach for state, datainformed/activesubspace reduction for parameter, and randomized misfit approach for data reduction. The method is designed to mitigate the bottle neck of largescale PDE solve, of high dimensional parameter space exploration, and of everincreasing volume of data. Various theoretical and numerical results will be presented to support the proposed approach. 
INI 1  
15:30 to 16:00  Afternoon Tea  
16:00 to 16:45  Poster Blitz  INI 1  
17:00 to 18:00  Poster Session & Welcome Wine Reception at INI 
09:00 to 09:45 
Michael Goldstein (Durham University) Small sample designs for multilevel, multioutput computer simulators
This talk is concerned with some general principles for the design of
experiments to learn about computer simulators with many inputs and
many outputs which may be evaluated at different levels of accuracy
and for which the top level simulator is expensive to evaluate for any
input choice. Our aim is to use many evaluations of a fast
approximation to the simulator to build an informative prior for the
top level simulator. Based on this prior, we may build a small but
informative design for the slow simulator. We will illustrate the
methodology on a design problem for an oil reservoir simulator.
(The work is joint with Jonathan Cumming.)

INI 1  
09:45 to 10:30 
Bruno Sudret (ETH Zürich) Dimensionality reduction and surrogate modelling for highdimensional UQ problems
In order to predict the behaviour of complex engineering systems (nuclear power plants, aircraft, infrastructure networks, etc.), analysts nowadays develop highfidelity computational models that try and capture detailed physics. A single run of such simulators can take minutes to hours even on the most advanced HPC architectures. In the context of uncertainty quantification, methods based on Monte Carlo simulation are simply not affordable. This has led to the rapid development of surrogate modelling techniques in the last decade, e.g. polynomial chaos expansions, lowrank tensor representations, Kriging (a.k.a Gaussian process models) among others.
Surrogate models have proven remarkable efficiency in the case of moderate dimensionality (e.g. tens to a hundred of inputs). In the case of highdimensional problems (hundreds to thousands of inputs), or when the input is cast as time series, 2D maps, etc., the classical setup of surrogate modelling does not apply straightforwardly. Usually, a preprocessing of the data is carried out to reduce this dimensionality, before a surrogate is constructed.
In this talk, we show that the sequential use of compression algorithms (for dimensionality reduction (DR), e.g. kernel principal component analysis) and surrogate modelling (SM) is suboptimal. Instead, we propose a new generalpurpose framework that cast the two subproblems into a single DRSM optimization. In this setup, the parameters of the DR step are selected so that as to maximize the quality of the subsequent surrogate model. The framework is versatile in the sense that the techniques used for DR and for SM can be freely selected and combined. Moreover, the method is purely datadriven.
The proposed approach is illustrated on different engineering problems including 1D and 2D elliptical SPDEs and earthquake engineering applications.

INI 1  
10:30 to 11:00  Morning Coffee  
11:00 to 11:45 
Jens Lang (Technische Universität Darmstadt) Adaptive Multilevel Stochastic Collocation Method for Randomized Elliptic PDEs
In this talk, I will present a new adaptive multilevel stochastic collocation method for randomized elliptic PDEs. A hierarchical sequence of adaptive mesh refinements for the spatial approximation is combined with adaptive anisotropic sparse Smolyak grids in the stochastic space in such a way as to minimize computational cost. Iprovide a rigorous analysis for the convergence and computational complexity of the adaptive multilevel algorithm. This is a joint work with Robert Scheichl from Bath.

INI 1  
11:45 to 12:30 
Elisabeth Ullmann (Technische Universität München) Multilevel estimators in Bayesian Inversion and Optimization
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) is a fast growing research area which deals with the impact of parameter, data and model uncertainties in complex systems. We focus on models which are based on partial differential equations (PDEs) with random inputs. For deterministic PDEs there are many classical analytical results and numerical tools available. The treatment of PDEs with random inputs, however, requires novel ideas and tools. We illustrate the mathematical and algorithmic challenges of UQ for Bayesian inverse problems arising from geotechnical engineering and medicine, and an optimal control problem with uncertain PDE constraints.

INI 1  
12:30 to 13:30  Lunch @ Churchill College  
14:00 to 14:45 
James Hensman (None / Other) Massive scale Gaussian processes with GPflow
In this talk I'll give an overview of how machine learning techniques have been used to scale Gaussian process models to huge datasets. I'll also introduce GPflow, a software library for Gaussian processes that leverages the computational framework TensorFlow, which is more commonly used for deep learning.

INI 1  
14:45 to 15:30 
Abdul Lateef Haji Ali (University of Oxford) Multilevel Nested Simulation for Efficient Risk Estimation
We investigate the problem of computing a nested expectation of the form P[E[XY] >= 0] = E[H(E[XY])] where H is the Heaviside function. This nested expectation appears, for example, when estimating the probability of a large loss from a financial portfolio. We present a method that combines the idea of using Multilevel Monte Carlo (MLMC) for nested expectations with the idea of adaptively selecting the number of samples in the approximation of the inner expectation, as proposed by (Broadie et al., 2011). We propose and analyse an algorithm that adaptively selects the number of inner samples on each MLMC level and prove that the resulting MLMC method with adaptive sampling has an order e^2log(e)^2 complexity to achieve a root meansquared error e. The theoretical analysis is verified by numerical experiments on a simple model problem.
Joint work with: Michael B. Giles (University of Oxford)

INI 1  
15:30 to 16:00  Afternoon Tea  
16:00 to 16:45 
Nathan Urban (Los Alamos National Laboratory) Multimodel and model structural uncertainty quantification with applications to climate science
A common approach to quantifying the uncertainty in computer model predictions is to calibrate their tuning parameters to observational data. However, the largest uncertainties may not lie in the models' parameters, but rather in their "structures": modelers make different choices in numerical schemes, physics approximations, subgrid closures, and included processes. These choices result in different models that all claim to represent the same system dynamics, but may disagree in their predictions.
This talk is aimed at presenting concepts and motivation concerning how to address such multimodel or structural uncertainty challenges. I present three methods. The first method, Bayesian multimodel combination, converts structural uncertainties in multiple computer models into parametric uncertainties within a reduced model. A hierarchical Bayesian statistical approach combines these parametric uncertainties into a single distribution representing multimodel uncertainty, which can be updated with observational constraints to dynamically biascorrect the multimodel ensemble. The second method uses system identification techniques to learn the governing equations of a PDE system. A nonintrusive model reduction approach is developed to rapidly explore uncertainties in alternate model structures by perturbing the learned dynamics. The third method is aimed at integrated uncertainty problems that require propagating uncertainties through multiple system components. It constructs a Bayesian network or graphical model where each node in the network quantifies uncertainties in a particular physical process, which can be informed by multiple types of model and data.

INI 1 
09:00 to 09:45 
Lars Grasedyck (RWTH Aachen University) Hierarchical Low Rank Tensors
Coauthors: Sebastian Krämer, Christian Löbbert, Dieter Moser (RWTH Aachen)
We introduce the concept of hierarchical low rank decompositions and approximations by use of the hierarchical Tucker format. In order to relate it to several other existing low rank formats we highlight differences, similarities as well as bottlenecks of these. One particularly difficult question is whether or not a tensor or multivariate function allows a priori a low rank representation or approximation. This question can be related to simple matrix decompositions or approximations, but still the question is not easy to answer, cf. the talks of Wolfgang Dahmen, Sergey Dolgov, Martin Stoll and Anthony Nouy. We provide numerical evidence for a model problem that the approximation can be efficient in terms of a small rank. In order to find such a decomposition or approximation we consider black box (cross) type nonintrusive sampling approaches. A special emphasis will be on postprocessing of the tensors, e.g. finding extremal points efficiently. This is of special interest in the context of model reduction and reliability analysis.

INI 1  
09:45 to 10:30 
Jie Chen (IBM Research) LinearCost Covariance Functions for Gaussian Random Fields
Coauthor: Michael L. Stein (University of Chicago) Gaussian random fields (GRF) are a fundamental stochastic model for spatiotemporal data analysis. An essential ingredient of GRF is the covariance function that characterizes the joint Gaussian distribution of the field. Commonly used covariance functions give rise to fully dense and unstructured covariance matrices, for which required calculations are notoriously expensive to carry out for large data. In this work, we propose a construction of covariance functions that result in matrices with a hierarchical structure. Empowered by matrix algorithms that scale linearly with the matrix dimension, the hierarchical structure is proved to be efficient for a variety of random field computations, including sampling, kriging, and likelihood evaluation. Specifically, with n scattered sites, sampling and likelihood evaluation has an O(n) cost and kriging has an O(logn) cost after preprocessing, particularly favorable for the kriging of an extremely large number of sites (e.g., predict ing on more sites than observed). We demonstrate comprehensive numerical experiments to show the use of the constructed covariance functions and their appealing computation time. Numerical examples on a laptop include simulated data of size up to one million, as well as a climate data product with over two million observations. 
INI 1  
10:30 to 11:00  Morning Coffee  
11:00 to 11:45 
Sergey Dolgov (University of Bath) Lowrank cross approximation algorithms for the solution of stochastic PDEs
Coauthors: Robert Scheichl (University of Bath) We consider the approximate solution of parametric PDEs using the lowrank Tensor Train (TT) decomposition. Such parametric PDEs arise for example in uncertainty quantification problems in engineering applications. We propose an algorithm that is a hybrid of the alternating least squares and the TT cross methods. It computes a TT approximation of the whole solution, which is particularly beneficial when multiple quantities of interest are sought. The new algorithm exploits and preserves the block diagonal structure of the discretized operator in stochastic collocation schemes. This disentangles computations of the spatial and parametric degrees of freedom in the TT representation. In particular, it only requires solving independent PDEs at a few parameter values, thus allowing the use of existing high performance PDE solvers. We benchmark the new algorithm on the stochastic diffusion equation against quasiMonte Carlo and dimensionadaptive sparse grids methods. For sufficiently smooth random fields the new approach is orders of magnitude faster. 
INI 1  
11:45 to 12:30 
Daniel Williamson (University of Exeter) Optimal dimensionreduced calibration and the terminal case for spatial models
Since the seminal paper by Kennedy and O’Hagan in 2001, the calibration of computer models using Gaussian process emulators has represented a gold standard for scientists and statisticians working to quantify uncertainty using complex computer codes. When the output of such codes is high dimensional, such as with the spatial fields routinely produced by climate models, the standard approach (attributed to Higdon in 2008) is to take principal components across the model output, and use the loadings on these as a lower dimensional representation of the model output that can be used within the Kennedy and O’Hagan framework.
In this talk I will argue that, in general, we should not expect this to work. I will introduce what we term a “terminal case analysis” for general computer model calibration, show the implications for inference of a terminal case analysis and argue that though a high dimensional computer model may not lead to a terminal case analysis, the standard statistical treatment outlined above invariably leads to one artificially. I will then present our solution to this which uses rotation ideas to fix the search directions of our lower dimensional representations so that general calibration of spatiotemporal models is possible. We apply our method to idealised examples and to the output of the state of the art Canadian atmosphere model CanAGCM4. We will see that the problem of calibrating climate models requires a great deal of novel statistical thinking before we, as a community, can claim to have a solution ready for this important application area. This is work done with (and by) Dr James Salter.

INI 1  
12:30 to 13:30  Lunch @ Churchill College  
13:30 to 17:00  Free Afternoon  
19:30 to 22:00  Formal Dinner at Emmanuel College 
09:00 to 09:45 
Gianluigi Rozza (SISSA) Weighted reduced order methods for parametrized PDEs with random inputs
In this talk we discuss a weighted approach for the reduction of parametrized partial differential equations with random input, focusing in particular on weighted approaches based on reduced basis (wRB) [Chen et al., SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis (2013); D. Torlo et al., submitted (2017)] and proper orthogonal decomposition (wPOD) [L. Venturi et al., submitted (2017)].
We will first present the wPOD approach. A first topic of discussion is related to the choice of samples and respective weights according to a quadrature formula. Moreover, to reduce the computational effort in the offline stage of wPOD, we will employ Smolyak quadrature rules. We will then introduce the wRB method for advection diffusion problems with dominant convection with random input parameters. The issue of the stabilisation of the resulting reduced order model will be discussed in detail.
This work is in collaboration with Francesco Ballarin (SISSA, Trieste), Davide Torlo (University of Zurich), and Luca Venturi (Courant Institute for Mathematical Sciences, NYC)

INI 1  
09:45 to 10:30 
Julia Brettschneider (University of Warwick) Model selection, model frames, and scientific interpretation
Modelling complex systems in engineering, science or social science involves selection of measurements on many levels including observability (determined e.g. by technical equipment, cost, confidentiality, existing records) and need for interpretability. Among the initially selected variables, the frequency and quality of observation may be altered by censoring and sampling biases.
A model is, by definition, a simplification, and the question one asks is often not whether a certain effect exists, but whether it matters. This crucially depends on the research objective or perspective. Biased conclusions occur when the research question is interwoven with the mechanisms in which the variables for the analysis are selected or weighted.
Such effects can occur in any applications that involve observational data. I will give some examples from a few of my own research projects involving quality assessment, decision making, financial trading, genomics and microscopy.

INI 1  
10:30 to 11:00  Morning Coffee  
11:00 to 11:45 
Olga Mula (Université ParisDauphine) Greedy algorithms for optimal measurements selection in state estimation using reduced models
Coauthors: Peter BINEV (University of South Carolina), Albert COHEN (University Pierre et Marie Curie), James NICHOLS (University Pierre et Marie Curie) Parametric PDEs of the general form $$\mathcal{P} (u,a) = 0$$ are commonly used to describe many physical processes, where $\cal P$ is a differential operator, $a$ is a highdimensional vector of parameters and $u$ is the unknown solution belonging to some Hilbert space $V$. A typical scenario in state estimation is the following: for an unknown parameter $a$, one observes $m$ independent linear measurements of $u(a)$ of the form $\ell_i(u) = (w_i, u), i = 1, ..., m$, where $\ell_i \in V'$ and $w_i$ are the Riesz representers, and we write $W_m = \text{span}\{w_1,...,w_m\}$. The goal is to recover an approximation $u^*$ of $u$ from the measurements. Due to the dependence on a the solutions of the PDE lie in a manifold and the particular PDE structure often allows to derive good approximations of it by linear spaces Vn of moderate dimension n. In this setting, the observed measurements and Vn can be combined to produce an approximation $u^*$ of $u$ up to accuracy $$ \Vert u u^* \Vert \leq \beta(V_n, W_m) \text{dist}(u, V_n) $$ where $$ \beta(V_n, W_m) := \inf_{v\in V_n} \frac{\Vert P_{W_m} v \Vert}{\Vert v \Vert} $$ plays the role of a stability constant. For a given $V_n$, one relevant objective is to guarantee that $\beta(V_n, W_m) \geq \gamma >0$ with a number of measurements $m \geq n$ as small as possible. We present results in this direction when the measurement functionals $\ell_i$ belong to a complete dictionary. If time permits, we will also briefly explain ongoing research on how to adapt the reconstruction technique to noisy measurements. Related Links 
INI 1  
11:45 to 12:30 
Martin Stoll (Technische Universität Chemnitz) Low rank methods for PDEconstrained optimization
Optimization subject to PDE constraints is crucial in many applications . Numerical analysis has contributed a great deal to allow for the efficient solution of these problems and our focus in this talk will be on the solution of the large scale linear systems that represent the first order optimality conditions. We illustrate that these systems, while being of very large dimension, usually contain a lot of mathematical structure. In particular, we focus on lowrank methods that utilize the Kronecker product structure of the system matrices. These methods allow the solution of a timedependent problem with the storage requirements of a small multiple of the steady problem. Furthermore, this technique can be used to tackle the added dimensionality when we consider optimization problems subject to PDEs with uncertain coefficients. The stochastic Galerkin FEM technique leads to a vast dimensional system that would be infeasible on any computer but using lowrank techniques this can be solved on a standard laptop computer.

INI 1  
12:30 to 13:30  Lunch @ Churchill College  
14:00 to 14:45 
Boris Kramer (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) ConditionalValueatRisk Estimation with ReducedOrder Models
We present two reducedorder model based approaches for the efficient and accurate evaluation of the ConditionalValueatRisk (CVaR) of quantities of interest (QoI) in engineering systems with uncertain parameters. CVaR is used to model objective or constraint functions in riskaverse engineering design and optimization applications under uncertainty. Estimating the CVaR of the QoI is expensive. While the distribution of the uncertain system parameters is known, the resulting QoI is a random variable that is implicitly determined via the state of the system. Evaluating the CVaR of the QoI requires sampling in the tail of the QoI distribution and typically requires many solutions of an expensive fullorder model of the engineering system. Our reducedorder model approaches substantially reduce this computational expense.

INI 1  
14:45 to 15:30 
Olivier Zahm (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Certified dimension reduction of the input parameter space of vectorvalued functions
Coauthors: Paul Constantine (University of Colorado), Clémentine Prieur (University Joseph Fourier), Youssef Marzouk (MIT) Approximation of multivariate functions is a difficult task when the number of input parameters is large. Identifying the directions where the function does not significantly vary is a key preprocessing step to reduce the complexity of the approximation algorithms. Among other dimensionality reduction tools, the active subspace is defined by means of the gradient of a scalarvalued function. It can be interpreted as the subspace in the parameter space where the gradient varies the most. In this talk, we propose a natural extension of the active subspace for vectorvalued functions, e.g. functions with multiple scalarvalued outputs or functions taking values in function spaces. Our methodology consists in minimizing an upperbound of the approximation error obtained using Poincarétype inequalities. We also compare the proposed gradientbased approach with the popular and widely used truncated KarhunenLoève decomposition (KL). We show that, from a theoretical perspective, the truncated KL can be interpreted as a method which minimizes a looser upper bound of the error compared to the one we derived. Also, numerical comparisons show that better dimension reduction can be obtained provided gradients of the function are available. 
INI 1  
15:30 to 16:00  Afternoon Tea  
16:00 to 16:45 
James Salter (University of Exeter) Quantifying spatiotemporal boundary condition uncertainty for the deglaciation
Ice sheet models are currently unable to reproduce the retreat of the North American ice sheet through the last deglaciation, due to the large uncertainty in the boundary conditions. To successfully calibrate such a model, it is important to vary both the input parameters and the boundary conditions. These boundary conditions are derived from global climate model simulations, and hence the biases from the output of these models are carried through to the ice sheet output, restricting the range of ice sheet output that is possible. Due to the expense of running global climate models for the required 21,000 years, there are only a small number of such runs available; hence it is difficult to quantify the boundary condition uncertainty.
We develop a methodology for generating a range of plausible boundary conditions, using a lowdimensional basis representation for the spatiotemporal input required. We derive this basis by combining key patterns, extracted from a small climate model ensemble of runs through the deglaciation, with sparse spatiotemporal observations. Varying the coefficients for the chosen basis vectors and ice sheet parameters simultaneously, we run ensembles of the ice sheet model. By emulating the ice sheet output, we history match iteratively and rule out combinations of the ice sheet parameters and boundary condition coefficients that lead to implausible deglaciations, reducing the uncertainty due to the boundary conditions.

INI 1 
09:00 to 09:45 
Peter Binev (University of South Carolina) State Estimation in Reduced Modeling
Coauthors: Albert Cohen (University Paris 6), Wolfgang Dahmen (University of South Carolina), Ronald DeVore (Texas A&M University), Guergana Petrova (Texas A&M University), Przemyslaw Wojtaszczyk (University of Warsaw) We consider the problem of optimal recovery of an element u of a Hilbert space H from measurements of the form l_j(u), j = 1, ... , m, where the l_j are known linear functionals on H. Motivated by reduced modeling for solving parametric partial differential equations, we investigate a setting where the additional information about the solution u is in the form of how well u can be approximated by a certain known subspace V_n of H of dimension n, or more generally, in the form of how well u can be approximated by each of a sequence of nested subspaces V_0, V_1, ... , V_n with each V_k of dimension k. The goal is to exploit additional information derived from the whole hierarchy of spaces rather than only from the largest space V_n. It is shown that, in this multispace case, the set of all u that satisfy the given information can be described as the intersection of a family of known ellipsoidal cylinders in H and that a near optimal recovery algorithm in the multispace pr oblem is provided by identifying any point in this intersection. 
INI 1  
09:45 to 10:30 
Catherine Powell (University of Manchester) Reduced Basis Solvers for Stochastic Galerkin Matrix Equations
In the applied mathematics community, reduced basis methods are typically used to reduce the computational cost of applying sampling methods to parameterdependent partial differential equations (PDEs). When dealing with PDE models in particular, repeatedly running computer models (eg finite element solvers) for many choices of the input parameters, is computationally infeasible. The cost of obtaining
each sample of the numerical solution is instead sought by projecting the socalled high fidelity problem into a reduced (lowerdimensional) space. The choice of reduced space is crucial in balancing cost and overall accuracy.
In this talk, we do not consider sampling methods. Rather, we consider stochastic Galerkin finite element methods (SGFEMs) for parameterdependent PDEs. Here, the idea is to approximate the solution to the PDE model as a function of the input parameters. We combine finite element approximation in physical space, with global polynomial approximation on the parameter domain. In the statistics community, the term intrusive polynomial chaos approximation is often used. Unlike samping methods, which require the solution of many deterministic problems, SGFEMs yield a single very large linear system of equations with coefficient matrices that have a characteristic Kronecker product structure.
By reformulating the systems as multiterm linear matrix equations, we have developed [see: C.E. Powell, D. Silvester, V.Simoncini, An efficient reduced basis solver for stochastic Galerkin matrix equations, SIAM J. Comp. Sci. 39(1), pp A141A163 (2017)] a memoryefficient solution algorithm which generalizes ideas from rational Krylov subspace approximation (which are known in the linear algebra community). The new approach determines a lowrank approximation to the solution matrix by performing a projection onto a reduced space that is iteratively augmented with problemspecific basis vectors. Crucially, it requires far less memory than standard iterative methods applied to the Kronecker formulation of the linear systems. For test problems consisting of elliptic PDEs, and indefinite problems with saddle point structure, we are able to solve systems of billions of equations on a standard desktop computer quickly and efficiently.

INI 1  
10:30 to 11:00  Morning Coffee  
11:00 to 11:45 
Benjamin Peherstorfer (University of WisconsinMadison) Multifidelity Monte Carlo estimation with adaptive lowfidelity models
Multifidelity Monte Carlo (MFMC) estimation combines low and highfidelity models to speedup the estimation of statistics of the highfidelity model outputs. MFMC optimally samples the low and highfidelity models such that the MFMC estimator has minimal meansquared error for a given computational budget. In the setup of MFMC, the lowfidelity models are static, i.e., they are given and fixed and cannot be changed and adapted. We introduce the adaptive MFMC (AMFMC) method that splits the computational budget between adapting the lowfidelity models to improve their approximation quality and sampling the low and highfidelity models to reduce the meansquared error of the estimator. Our AMFMC approach derives the quasioptimal balance between adaptation and sampling in the sense that our approach minimizes an upper bound of the meansquared error, instead of the error directly. We show that the quasioptimal number of adaptations of the lowfidelity models is bounded even in the limit case that an infinite budget is available. This shows that adapting lowfidelity models in MFMC beyond a certain approximation accuracy is unnecessary and can even be wasteful. Our AMFMC approach tradesoff adaptation and sampling and so avoids overadaptation of the lowfidelity models. Besides the costs of adapting lowfidelity models, our AMFMC approach can also take into account the costs of the initial construction of the lowfidelity models (``offline costs''), which is critical if lowfidelity models are computationally expensive to build such as reduced models and datafit surrogate models. Numerical results demonstrate that our adaptive approach can achieve orders of magnitude speedups compared to MFMC estimators with static lowfidelity models and compared to Monte Carlo estimators that use the highfidelity model alone.

INI 1  
11:45 to 12:30 
Anthony Nouy (Université de Nantes) Principal component analysis for learning tree tensor networks
We present an extension of principal component analysis for functions of multiple random variables and an associated algorithm
for the approximation of such functions using treebased lowrank formats (tree tensor networks). A multivariate function is here considered as an element of a Hilbert tensor space of functions defined on a product set equipped with a probability measure.
The algorithm only requires evaluations of functions on a structured set of points which is constructed adaptively. The algorithm constructs a hierarchy of subspaces associated with the different nodes of a dimension partition tree and a corresponding hierarchy of projection operators, based on interpolation or leastsquares projection. Optimal subspaces are estimated using empirical principal component analysis of interpolations of partial random evaluations of the function.
The algorithm is able to provide an approximation in any treebased format with either a prescribed rank or a prescribed relative error, with a number of evaluations of the order of the storage complexity of the approximation format.

INI 1  
12:30 to 13:30  Lunch @ Churchill College  
14:00 to 14:45  Discussion  INI 1 